Divine Command Theory Explored; Part 1 in the Series on Ethical Theories
Friday, August 31st, 2007Divine Command Theory is perhaps one of the easiest moral theories to understand and one that we are all surely familiar with. Put quite simply Divine Command Theory states that an action is morally right if it is divinely commanded. The reverse side of that coin is that if an action is divinely prohibited it is morally wrong.
Simple right? Well, not quite. Divine Command Theory works really well for deciding if your actions are right or wrong if you happen to be in constant, clear, and direct communication with divinity. Very few people believe they have that kind of connection. This is a sort of Divine Command Theory taken to the extreme.
More commonly, Divine Command Theorist use an accepted set of divinely inspired or written texts to determine right from wrong. The Ten Commandments are a perfect example of this. I’ll call this “Divine Scripture Theory.” Divine Scripture Theory can and at times has worked very well for conflict resolution. There are stipulations however, all parties must believe in the same god and the same scriptures. However this problem can be almost completely dismissed in ranking the theory’s effectiveness because most if not all theories need to find common ground in conflict resolution. I’ll call this the “Common Ground Problem.”
What if the scriptures do not directly address a particular issue? Well some adherents dismiss this outright saying that the scripture will address every issue if you study it enough or properly. Others however say that rather than relying solely on direct commands or scripture one should look for the principles that the divinity set forth in the scriptures or in past commands.
A more relevant problem is that all parties to a conflict must interpret the scripture the same way. Scripture interpretation differences are the heart of why there are Evangelicals, Roman Catholics, Charismatics, Eastern Orthodox, and so many other different groups all claiming to be Christians. Scripture interpretation is also at the heart of the current debate in Islam about violence and jihad. Clearly in the recent past most people thought of Islam as a peaceful religion but clearly there are now some Muslims who disagree. Many Muslims believe that when the Qur’an speaks of jihad it means a sort of warring with one’s self to become a better Muslim. Others however interpret this scripture differently and I don’t think I need to elaborate.
This brings us to our next problem with Divine Command Theory. What divinity are we talking about? Clearly different religions have different gods that might issue different commands or no commands at all.
Another problem exists in polytheistic religions. What god do you listen to? (As a side note, there are still many people worldwide who are polytheists. The Hindus, The Voodoo, as well as most other Eastern and African religions.)
Socrates asks the question “Do the gods command a thing because it is right? Or is a thing right because the gods command it?” If you believe in an omnipotent (all-powerful) god then the answer is the later and this is important for a divine command theorist. If however you believe in a multitude of gods then the answer must be the first, if either of these. The reason is that multiple gods cannot be omnipotent. Omnipotent means more powerful than any other being. If there were two omnipotent beings then they would either cease to be omnipotent or both in fact be identical and therefore be the same single god. So monotheists can believe in an omnipotent god polytheists cannot.
Earlier I eluded to the fact that polytheist might not answer with either of the possibilities posed by Socrates because the case often is in polytheistic religions that the gods are in competition with each other. Think of the ancient Greek gods for an example of what I’m talking about. If the gods are competing and constantly attempting to undercut one another they cannot logically all only command what is right and good. This explains why Divine Command Theory is almost exclusively applied by monotheists. I will attempt to explore polytheistic ethical theory in a latter article but for now try to digest the Divine Command Theory for yourself.
One last thing I would like to say is that Divine Command Theory is often dismissed by so called intellectuals as primitive. It is not at all, on the contrary if you believe God is speaking to you; you would have to be a baboon not to listen.
Joseph W. Kraft II is The Under Age Thinker. Check out his Website at underagethinker.com underagethinker.com